I’m sure that I’m not the only one that feels this way, but what the labour movement is lacking most at this time, is an international. It has been decades since a true workers international has existed: there was the First international, the Second international, the Third (arguabley the golden era of communism), and that was all.
Some may say ” what about the Trotskyist fourth international ?”. I reply , “what about it?”
The fourth international is anything but. Rather than fostering unity of workers organizations and leading the working class to victory, the fourth international has produced nothing but steaming mounds of ivory-tower analysis, and a thousand different splinter groups. I take offense that the mantle of the International has been appropriated by what basically amounts to a political clique. The fourth international is not an international at all; It is an exclusive club for Trotskyists and Trotskyist organizations, nothing more.
So what is the true internationalist organization of the workers? If not the fourth international, what organization do the workers of the world have to uphold the banner of Marxism-Leninism and international socialism?
Perhaps, the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (RIM)? Hardly.
The Revolutionary Internationalist Movement deserves credit, in that they have mobilized the working class in many nations, such as Nepal, India, Peru, etc. On the other hand, the RIM also is a political clique, especially in the western world. Membership in RIM, as far as I know, revolves around being a follower of Mao Tse-Tung thought/ Maoism. Rather than trying to unite the loose threads of Marxism-Leninism and focus the power of the working class, RIM continues to divide the movement, as their clique excludes flavours of Marxism-Leninism that do not exhalt Mao.
The Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) is no better in this respect, even shunning the other Maoists of the RIM, accusing them of being CIA related.
The Anarcho-Syndicalist International Workers of the World (IWW, often called “Wobblies”) also entertain notions of being the workers organization, especially as they aspire to one united Union. The obvious flaws of Anarcho-syndicalism aside, the IWW does not live up to such lofty standards either, even their own slogans of “Call a general strike” and “One big Union.”. The workers, from factory to field, have by overwhelming majority never heard of the IWW (which is quite common with most organizations that dub themselves “workers organizations”). The make-up of the IWW is not workers and labourers, but mostly Anarcho-syndicalist students. As with all previously mentioned organizations, the IWW is also a political clique, out of touch with the working class, and floating among the left-wing community.
There are very few workers organizations that exist these days ; Most of what exists these days are political cliques and personality cults. Many “Workers Parties” these days exist only to put flowers on the graves of their founders, rather than to try and mobilize the working class towards proletarian revolution. Any organizations that survived the cold war (or have sprung up since then,), which still entertain ideas of the victory of socialism, sell themselves short by dividing into camps and removing themselves from both the realities of the working class and from the theory of Marxism-Leninism.
It is discouraging that in this time, when capitalism is floundering in all of it’s imperialist endeavours, when it is desperately clawing at all deposits of resources and hissing at all nations with some form of workers control/national sovereignty, trying to escape it’s imminent demise… At this time, there is no rejoicing from the workers parties. Capitalism is failing astronomically, there is a general air of anti-imperialist sentiment and dis-illusion with the system among the masses, and yet there is no celebration among Marxist-Leninists. On the contrary, we are in no position to celebrate. The self-destructive cliquing and isolationism of the workers parties and organizations, not to mention the splintering and outright capitulationism of many of these organizations, has left our movement in a sad state. Unfortunately, it seems to be the Liberal and Social-Democratic parties that are poised to pick up the pieces from the fallout of world capitalism, not the Marxist-Leninist workers parties. Of course, this is a situation that could be remedied, but that depends on the unity and active state of the communist workers movement.
We, the labour movement and Marxist-Leninist parties are a sword; the problem is, we have been shattered into too many pieces to be wielded against any foe. We must reforge this sword. We must re-establish the international of workers parties, based on he foundations of Marxism-Leninism.
April 7, 2007 at 11:58 am |
I totally agree with the views outlined in this post, but I’m not too sure about having another Communist International.
The Third International was successful to a greater extent because it was backed by a powerful socialist state, the USSR.
I don’t think we have that situation any more.
April 22, 2007 at 3:55 am |
The reason why the 3rd international was ended was that it was too stifling in that it didn’t take material condtions in each nation for revolution and often made mistakes in judging how a revolution or general situation should be carried out. At the same time, just having no interational is not right either. Your only critiscism of the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement is that they are Maoist, well, that is because Maoism has been the most successful theory of revolution for the masses all over the world. People’s War has worked over and over again. But as a matter of fact, to my knowledge, non-maoist parties are also allowed in the RIM I think. My party for example, is not completely orthodox in that it doesn’t agree with how Mao supported various movements in opposition to the Soviets.
April 26, 2007 at 2:18 am |
Here’s an interesting page from Revolutionary Democracy that displays some excerpts from Dimitrov’s diary.
On the Dissolution of the Comintern http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv8n2/dimitrov.htm
It gives reasons to why the Third International was dissolved. Also, the period and situation from the First International to the Second and the Third was always different in relation to each other. They arose as a consequence of specific conditions at that time. I was talking with a comrade of mine who made the point that the present period is somewhat resemblance of the period in which Marx and Engels lived in, in whch the working class and people were blocked from organizing. If one thinks and study the First International and the aim of what it was trying to accomplish, it seems to reflect the period we are in now, somewhat, but different. Marx and Engels assisted in organizing all the pregessive forces as a means to block the violent reaction of capitalism and to put forward a new arrangement of organizing society. I believe to some extent, after the collapse of the Second International Lenin and the Bolshevik Party was faced with a somewhat similiar task, but in a completely different context.
Excellent post by the way…always enjoy reading your thoughts Comrade Raven!
May 13, 2007 at 12:11 pm |
[...] reading Comrade Raven’s “The Internationale Shall be the Human Race” I began researching a bit on the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (RIM). Along with [...]
May 17, 2007 at 1:34 pm |
What about the parties that make up the International Communist Seminar? It’s definitely a first step in the right direction. See:
http://www.icsbrussels.org/
It includes the WP of Belgium, CP of Cuba, PCML of Ecuador, NCP of Netherlands, Greek KKE, etc.
May 18, 2007 at 4:11 pm |
No disrespect, but I wouldn’t call the International Communist Seminar an international either.
It is good to see them working together, and doing something is always better than nothing, but as a grand union of organizations, what are they doing to mobilize the working class? What are they doing to confront capitalism?
If they are just prinitng their newspaper and meeting in Brussels once a year, than they are another stagnant political clique, just like all the other organizations I’ve mentioned.